Account successfully created. Please check your inbox to verify your email id and login.
Sign in with
Already have an account?
Sign in
or create with
We are glad to have you onboard! But before we start we will need to make sure we’ve got the right email for you.
Go to HomepageReel Number: 220564-04-P1
Color: Black and White
Sound: SD
Year / Date: 1947,1940s
Country: USA
Location: Washington, DC
TC Begins: 11:19:34
TC Ends: 11:25:02
Duration: 00:05:28
1947 - Government, USA, HUAC Hearing - 1947 - Eric Johnston Testimony, R2 of 2 10Oct47 Card 1 of 2 Eric Johnston at table giving testimony and statements: “If it were proved to be true I would not employ Mr. Lawson because I would not employ any proven or admitted Communist because they are just a disruptive force & I don't want them around.” Stripling: “They could be a disruptive force within the motion picture industry; isn't that true?” Johnston: “Of course”. Stripling: “Don't you think this committee has an obligation to expose them if they are there?” Johnston: I have always said that you did, but I have always thought you should do it under the American program of a free & fair trial. I have never objected to your investigating Hollywood. I told you we welcomed it, & we sincerely do. We haven't always welcomed some of the methods you have adopted.” 11:20:23 “You have said, & it is the kind of a statement that I am very happy to hear a member of the committee make, it is the type of statement which is a truly American statement, but perhaps you are misinformed about some angles of it. May I suggest to you that, for instance, when I was on the stand here in March I was asked over & over again, & I have the testimony here before me, why we hadn't made anti-Communist pictures, & what were we going to do about making them. I tried, Mr. McDowell, at that time to say that this industry was before a congressional committee in the early 1940's because they said we were war-mongering. We don't want to be called again before an investigation, Congressional investigating committee, and be called warmongering. Furthermore, Mr, McDowell, the questions asked me repeatedly, & the questions asked repeatedly of witnesses during this present investigation, have indicated ‘Are you making anti-Commnnist pictures & why don't yon make them?’ Now, we feel that this is the duty & responsibility of the producers just as it is the duty & the responsibility of publishers, Mr. McDowell, to determine what goes in their newspapers.” 11:21:40 McDowell: I agree with you, Mr. Johnston. I would like to point out to you” (edit) 11:21:46 Johnston: “we welcomed an investigation in Hollywood & we certainly think it is warranted.” Mr. Vail: “I am glad to hear you say that.” Johnston; “The thing that perturbs me, Mr. Vail, is, for in- stance, you had a Mr. Howard Rushmore here to testify, I think you had complete confidence in his integrity, he was a former admitted Communist but had seen the error of his ways, like the Bible says, & reformed.” 11:22:18 Vail: (to Johnston’s statement) “to the effect ‘That we had no responsibility for the political or economic views of any particular individual but we do have a responsibility for what goes on on the screen’." Johnston: “Right.” Vail: "’We regard that with great care’. You are aware, I presume, of the fact that through-out this country in a great many municipalities we have moving-picture censor boards set up by those municipalities?” (edit) continued on card 2 of 2 Anti-Communist; Friendly Witnesses; Hollywood Ten; Blacklists; 1940s; Motion Picture Industry; House Committee On UnAmerican Activities; Movies; Politics; Motion Picture Association Of America; Testimony; NOTE: Stripling aka Robert Stripling, Chief Investigator for HUAC. McDowell aka Rep. John McDowell of Pennsylvania; Vail aka Representative Richard B. Vail of Illinois. NOTE: Partial or entire of 2 cards (11:19:34 - 11:25:02) sold at per reel rate.